Academic Integrity (Policy SW-25)
Policy:
Students at Clarkson College are expected to be honest and forthright in their academic endeavors. The mission of Clarkson College includes the expectation of high standards in ethical behavior as well as in scholarship. Academic integrity is an integral component of Clarkson College’s mission and values. Clarkson College seeks to foster respect (for self and others), truth in honest achievement and positive relationships among stakeholders in our academic community.
Academic dishonesty includes any form of cheating and/or plagiarism that results in students giving or receiving unauthorized assistance in an academic exercise or receiving credit for work that is not their own. Cheating, plagiarism, fabrication, or other forms of academic dishonesty corrupt the learning process and demean the educational environment for all students.
Definitions of academic dishonesty include, but are not limited to:
- Fabrication: Making any oral or written statement that the individual knows, or should have known, to be untrue. Examples of fabrication include, but are not limited to, the following actions:
- Making a false statement to faculty, Clarkson College employee(s), fellow students or clinical agency personnel.
- Altering records or other academic materials.
- Cheating: Giving, receiving, offering, or soliciting information on any examination, quiz, or other assignment, not authorized by the instructor. Examples of cheating include, but are not limited to, the following actions:
- Copying from another student’s paper.
- Intentionally using or attempting to use any unauthorized aid, materials, or electronic devices in connection with any form of academic work.
- Collaboration with another student without instructor approval on
any examination, quiz, nursing care plan, computer or laboratory work, or any other assignment.Collaboration includes the exchange of materials or ideas verbally or non-verbally. - Buying, selling, possessing, soliciting, transmitting, or using any material purported to be the unreleased contents of any assignment, including examinations and quizzes.
- Bribery or solicitation of any person to obtain or to provide any information relating to examinations, quizzes or other assignments.
- Substitution for another person during an examination or quiz.
- Unauthorized use of advanced automated tools, such as artificial intelligence or machine learning tools (e.g. ChatGPT) on assignments without explicit approval from the course instructor.
- Collusion: Working together with another person with an “illegal” or “deceitful” purpose in the preparation of work which an instructor expects to be accomplished on an individual basis.
- Plagiarism: To steal or pass off the ideas or words of another as one’s own, without crediting the source. Examples of plagiarism include, but are not limited to, the following actions:
- Quoting word for word from a source without using quotation marks, footnotes, reference, or bibliographic citation.
- Summarizing and paraphrasing ideas without acknowledging the source.
- Submitting work for credit not written by the student, including material from an online source, papers written by another person, or buying a paper from a commercial source.
- Submitting, without prior permission, academic work previously submitted in identical or similar form.
- Failure to Report: When behavior suspicious of a Code of Conduct violation is not brought to the attention of the faculty for investigation.
- Misrepresentation: "Providing false information to an instructor concerning an academic exercise" (Hollinger & Lanza-Kanduce, 1996). Examples of misrepresentation include, but are not limited to, the following actions:
- Giving a false excuse for missing an examination, quiz or assignment deadline.
- Falsely claiming to have submitted a paper or assignment.
- Sabotage: "Consists of actions that prevent others from completing their work” (Stern & Havlicek, 1986). Examples of sabotage include, but are not limited to, the following actions:
- Disturbing someone’s lab experiment or project.
- Moving materials from a reserved reading file so that others cannot use them.
Procedure:
Faculty Responsibility:
Because academic honesty is of vital concern to the faculty and because each discipline may raise its own specific set of issues, all faculty members are required to discuss academic integrity in their classrooms and explain how Clarkson College policy applies in each of their courses. Faculty who have specific outcomes/consequences for incidences of academic dishonesty related to specific assignments in their courses are strongly encouraged to provide this information to their students within the course syllabus.
Student Responsibility:
At a minimum, Clarkson College expects the student to complete any assignment, exams, and other academic endeavors with the utmost honesty, which requires the student to:
- Acknowledge the contributions of other sources to their scholastic efforts
- Complete assignments independently unless otherwise instructed
- Follow instructions for assignments and exams and observe the standards of academic discipline
- Avoid engaging in any form of academic dishonesty on behalf of the student or another student
- Ask the faculty if there are any questions regarding academic honesty
Students found guilty of violating the Academic Integrity policy may face academic sanctions by the faculty for the course. Possible sanctions faculty may impose include, but are not limited to the following:
- Loss of credit on the assignment/exam
- Have the student redo the assignment
- Lower the student’s grade for the assignment
- Lower the student’s grade for the course
- Fail the student in the course
Academic Integrity Violation Procedure:
Incidents of academic dishonesty will not be tolerated, and students suspected of such conduct are subject to disciplinary measures as outlined below. Faculty and students involved in the academic integrity issue will be held to the strictest guidelines of confidentiality in all matters pertaining to the issue.
Step 1: The faculty member notifies their program director (or designee) of the alleged academic integrity issue, including evidence. The faculty member must complete the Academic Integrity Conference Form (See Attachment A). The burden of proof rests with the faculty.
Step 2: Faculty contacts the student regarding the alleged violation of the Academic Integrity policy and schedules a meeting with the student to take place within five (5) business days* of when the occurrence was identified. The faculty advises the student to bring all supporting evidence to the meeting with the faculty related to the alleged academic integrity issue.
Step 3: Faculty discusses the issue with the student, and the student completes and returns Part II of the form to faculty within one (1) business day* of the meeting, attaching any additional evidence as needed.
At the meeting, the faculty member documents what disciplinary actions will be taken. Disciplinary action will be at the faculty’s discretion. Faculty informs the student of their right to due process and timeline.**
Step 4: Faculty member will write a summary letter of the incident. The faculty member then forwards a copy of the Conference Form along with the summary letter and all supporting evidence to those designated on the bottom of the form.
If the student fails to meet with the faculty member before the deadline or return the form with a signature within one (1) business day *, the standing decision is final.
Step 5: Upon completion of the Academic Integrity violation procedure, the VPAA will forward the appropriate completed documents to the following people:
- Program director and Academic Advisor - Academic Integrity Conference Form with supporting evidence and sanction letter from VPAA
- Registrar - Sanction letter from VPAA
- Student - Sanction letter from VPAA
Step 6: The VPAA will maintain a record of student violations of the Academic Integrity policy and make appropriate sanctions to students who are found to be in repeated violation of the Academic Integrity policy. In addition, the VPAA will review and track issues of academic integrity, and report data and trends of academic integrity to the Clarkson College community.
Step 7: Faculty will refrain from assigning a final course grade for the student until the academic integrity issue is resolved. If the course concludes before resolution, the faculty will assign a grade that reflects the faculty’s decision post-violation, which will align with the Results section of the Academic Integrity Conference Form (Attachment A). Note that, in the event of an overturned violation due to appeal, a grade change form must be submitted within one (1) semester following completion of the course.
Sanctions
In the event a student is found guilty of violations
- The VPAA will send a letter to the student informing them of the Academic Integrity violation and possible consequences of future violations of the policy.
- At this level, the student must meet with the program director to discuss the Academic Integrity policy and remediate as appropriate.
- The program director must document what remediation was given.
- If the violation is substantiated, the student is not eligible for the Academic Excellence Award.
Second violation: Academic Integrity Probation
- The VPAA will send a letter to the student informing them of the Academic Integrity violation and possible consequences of future violations of the policy. The VPAA will notify the Registrar.
- The student is placed on Academic Integrity Probation.
- A student is placed on Academic Integrity Probation.
- A student is placed on Academic Integrity Probation for their second violation to the Acdemic Integrity policy. A notation is placed in the student’s file to serve as an alert to the student that their academic behavior is unacceptable and to impress upon them the importance of giving serious attention to their academic integrity behavior in order to continue to be a student at Clarkson College.
- The student will remain on Academic Integrity Probation until graduation.
- A student is placed on Academic Integrity Probation.
- At this level, the student must meet with the program director to discuss the Academic Integrity policy and remediate as appropriate.
- The program director must document what remediation was given.
Third violation: Dismissal from Clarkson College
- Three violations of the Academic Integrity policy will result in the student being dismissed from Clarkson College by the VPAA.
- The VPAA will send a letter to inform the student of the Academic Integrity violation and dismissal from Clarkson College.
Due Process
Academic integrity issues should be resolved at the lowest level possible. However, when a student disagrees with a faculty member regarding academic integrity, the student has fourteen (14) business days * to submit an appeal in writing to the VPAA. The VPAA will convene an Academic Integrity Appeals Committee to review the appeal within fourteen (14) business days * of the request. If the student fails to meet the above deadline for appealing a decision, the standing decision is final.
Academic Integrity Committee
The Academic Integrity Appeals Committee‘s purpose is to serve as an appellate board. The membership of the Academic Integrity Appeals Committee will consist of the following: the Vice President of Academic Affairs (VPAA) and the Vice President of Enrollment and Retention (VPER) will be the co-chairs and non-voting members of the Academic Integrity Appeals Committee. The co-chairs will de-identify the dispute to maintain confidentiality. The co-chairs will convene six (6) members of the academic community for the Academic Integrity Appeals Committee. The co-chairs convene administration, faculty, and students who are deemed to not have any conflicts of interest with regard to any part of the dispute. Members of the Academic Integrity Appeals Committee will be held to the strictest guidelines of confidentiality in all matters pertaining to faculty and students. The committee will consist of the following:
- One (1) program director/coordinator selected by the co-chair who is outside the student’s major or minor
- Two (2) faculty members selected by the Faculty Senate President who teach outside the student’s major or minor and who have had at least two full-time semesters of employment;
- Three (3) students selected by Student Senate (STS) who are enrolled outside the student’s major or minor and who have earned at least 24 semester hours at Clarkson College
- If STS is unable to select students within a timely manner, the VPAA or VPER will request assistance from program directors to help recruit students.
Committee Procedures:
- Once the committee is convened, the co-chair will provide all evidence submitted by the respective faculty member and student.
- Upon reviewing the evidence, each committee member will submit a confidential ballot to the co-chair indicating a substantiated or unsubstantiated vote.
- Substantiated/Yes: faculty evidence supports the academic violation charges brought upon the student
- Unsubstantiated/No: faculty evidence is not sufficient to support the academic violation charges brought upon the student
- The outcome will be decided by a simple majority.
- In the event of a split decision among the committee members, the student will be considered innocent.
- Attachment B outlines the meeting guidelines
The Academic Integrity Committee’s decision is final. There is no appeal to this process.
The chair of the Academic Integrity Appeals Committee will notify the student’s program director, course program director, and faculty of the committee's decision within five (5) business days* of the decision. The chair will notify the student of the committee's decision by certified letter.
Attachment A: Academic Integrity Conference Form, to be completed by both the student and instructor
Attachment B: Academic Remediation Form: (Internal use only)
Academic Policies and Procedures
- Academic Honors (Policy AA-16)
- Academic Integrity (Policy SW-25)
- Academic Probation (Policy AA-20)
- Academic Related Activities and Travel Release (Policy SW-40)
- Academic Travel Abroad Release (Policy SW-11)
- Academic Year
- Access to Campus Facilities (Policy SW-28)
- Admissions (Policy AD-1, AD-2, and AD-11)
- Advanced Standing Credit (Policy AA-47)
- Application and Enrollment Fee Waivers (Policy AD-4)
- Articulation Agreements
- Assessment of Student Success Skills (Policy OG-23)
- Auditing a Course (Policy AA-35)
- Background Checks and Drug Screening for Students (Policy SW-23)
- Clarkson College Behavioral Intervention Team (Policy SW-24)
- Bookstore Voucher (Policy SA-2)
- Business Ethics (Policy EC-21)
- Cancellation of Course (Policy AA-36)
- Change of Personal Information
- Code of Conduct (Policy SW-18)
- Conditional Acceptance and Recitation Requirements (Policy AD-11)
- Copyright (Policy IT-4)
- Course Load Requirements (Policy FA-6)
- Coursework Categories for Undergraduate Degrees
- Credit Hour Definition (Policy AA-55)
- Crime Awareness & Campus Security (Policy SW-5)
- Undergraduate Deans List (Policy AA-27)
- Degree Progress Audit (Policy AA-5)
- Disbursement of Financial Aid (Policy FA-2)
- Discontinuance of an Academic Program (EC-24)
- Dismissal (Policy AA-24)
- Drug and Alcohol (Policy SW-15)
- Computing Policy (Policy IT-2)
- Email (Policy IT-1)
- Emergency Notification, Response and Evacuation (Policy SW-30)
- Emotional Support Animal (Policy SW-38)
- Equal Opportunity and Non- Discrimination (Policy SW-1)
- Family Education Rights & Privacy Act (Policy SS-9)
- Financial Aid Award (Policy FA-19)
- Financial Aid Eligibility Requirements (Policy FA-20)
- Forms Submission
- Freedom of Expression (Policy EC-22)
- Grade Change (Policy AA-37)
- Grade Point Average (Policy AA-29)
- Grade Reports
- Graduation Eligibility (Policy AA-8)
- Health and Safety Requirements (Policy SW-7)
- Help Desk (Policy IT-7)
- Identification Badge (Policy SS-10)
- Incomplete Grades (Policy AA-10)
- Independent Study (Policy AA-41)
- Information Security Program (Policy IT-9)
- Institutional Repository (Policy OG-30)
- Institutional Review of Research Involving Human Subjects (Policy OG-8)
- International Admissions & Transcripts (Policy AD-2)
- Interprofessional Education, Intercultural Development Inventory (IDI), and Service (AA-54)
- Issuing Timely Warnings (Policy SW-32)
- Last Date of Attendance (Policy AA-63)
- Law Enforcement on Campus (Policy SW-33)
- Leave of Absence (Policy AA-30)
- Letter Grades and Quality Points (Policy AA-6)
- Liability Insurance (Policy SW-12)
- Library Collection Development (Policy OG-29)
- Media (Policy OG-12)
- Missing Student (Policy SW-34)
- Non-Smoking (Policy SW-16)
- Online Education
- Organizational Governance-Policy Guidelines (OG-15)
- Petition for a Course Offering
- Student Petition for Reconsideration (Policy SW-22)
- Privacy (Policy IT-3)
- Professional Judgment (Policy FA-17)
- Program Completion (Policy AA-17)
- Progression (Policy AA-2)
- Public Address System (Policy OG-3)
- Public Complaint (Policy EC-20)
- Readmission (Policy AD-10)
- Registration/Add a Course (Policy AA-32)
- Reporting Criminal Offenses (Policy SW-36)
- Credit Hour Residency Requirement (Policy AA-28)
- Records Retention (Policy EC-2)
- Satisfactory Academic Progress for Financial Aid Eligibility (FA-21)
- Security Awareness Programs (Policy SW-37)
- Service Animal (Policy SW-39)
- Sexual Misconduct (Policy SW-27)
- Social Media (Policy OG-28)
- State Authorization
- Statement of Financial Responsibility (Policy SA-12)
- Student Accommodations (Policy SW-2)
- Student Classifications & Status
- Student Grievance (Policy SW-14)
- Student Location & Disclosures for Professional Licensure or Certification Disclosure (Policy OG-33)
- Student Parking (Policy SS-1)
- Teach-Out (Policy AA-64)
- Transcripts
- Transfer Credit (Policy AA-52)
- Tuition Refund (Policy SA-6)
- Undergraduate Class Standing (Policy AA-38)
- Weather-Related School Closing (Policy OG-4)
- Withdrawal From Course Grade (Policy AA-3)